See the real status codes behind redirects, failures and indexation issues
Inspect HTTP status codes across redirect chains to verify 200, 301, 302, 404, 410 and 5xx behavior during technical SEO audits.
When a page fails to index or a migration behaves unpredictably, the root cause is often in the response codes. RedirectCheck surfaces those responses without forcing you to piece them together manually.
Why do SEOs care about 301 vs 302 so much?
Because they signal different intent. A 301 is a permanent move, while a 302 is temporary. Using the wrong one can confuse indexing and migration behavior.
Should I check only the final status code?
No. The intermediate responses matter too. A chain can finish on 200 and still be unhealthy because of temporary redirects, loops or unnecessary hops earlier in the path.
Related Guides
More SEO workflow pages
SEO Workflow
Redirect Checker
Run a live redirect checker for migrations, URL consolidations and cleanup work. Inspect status codes, hop count, final destination and chain-level issues in one place.
Open guideStatus Signals
301 Redirect Checker
Use a 301 redirect checker to confirm that old URLs resolve with the right permanent status code and land on the intended canonical destination.
Open guideTemporary Redirects
302 vs 307 Redirects
Compare 302 vs 307 redirects in practical terms: temporary intent, method preservation, browser behavior and SEO-safe deployment choices.
Open guide