Migration QA

Find unnecessary hops and clean them up before launch

Use a redirect chain checker to identify multi-hop redirects, weak canonical flows and chain regressions after deploys or migrations.

Most redirect problems are not complete failures. They are messy chains that technically work, but waste crawl budget, slow users down and make migrations harder to trust.

What This Page Covers
Highlights hop count changes and chain shape changes between runs
Supports saved projects, folders and tags for migration workstreams
Makes recurring checks visible to both personal and workspace scopes
Common Use Cases
Audit legacy redirects after domain, HTTPS or slug migrations.
Compare current and previous runs to detect new hops in production.
Track recurring checks on high-risk URLs with scheduled monitoring.
FAQ

How many redirects in a chain are acceptable?

The practical target is one direct redirect to the final canonical URL. Two or more hops usually mean there is cleanup work left, especially on important URLs.

Can redirect chains hurt performance too?

Yes. Every extra hop adds latency and raises the chance of failure, so chain cleanup improves both SEO hygiene and user-facing speed.